|
|
|
¿øÁ¾¼ø ( Won Jong-Soon ) - À»Áö´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¹ÚÇü¼÷ ( Park Hyoung-Sook ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ ½ÅÀ±Èñ ( Shin Yun-Hee ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ¿øÁÖÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú ¹ÚÈ¿Á¤ ( Park Hyo-Jung ) - ÀÌÈ¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú ÀÓ¼¼Çö ( Lim Se-Hyun ) - ±Øµ¿´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú ½Å¹Ì°æ ( Shin Mee-Kyung ) - ³ª»ç·¿´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú ±èÁ¤Èñ ( Kim Jung-Hee ) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ ±è¿µÁÖ ( Kim Young-Ju ) - ¼º½Å¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ À强¿Á ( Chang Sung-Ok ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ Á¤½Â±³ ( Chaung Seung-Kyo ) - ¼¼¸í´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú ¾ç¿µ¿Á ( Yang Young-Ok ) - °¡¾ß´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide a basis for improvement and enhancement of nursing education by investigating learning outcomes that apply to fundamentals of nursing and teaching methods used in classes.
Methods: Data were collected from 111 professors of fundamentals of nursing who responded to the self-report questionnaire. Data were analyzed using chi-square test.
Results: For learning outcomes in fundamentals of nursing the most frequent number of outcomes was two (35.2%), or three (32.4%). For learning outcomes in fundamentals of nursing practicum, the most frequent number of outcomes was two (32.4%), or three (31.6%). In fundamental nursing classes, teaching methods used most frequently were lectures (98.2%) and videos (60.4%), and in practice classes, demonstration (98.2) and open laboratory (90.9%). Constructivist teaching methods that were utilized in fundamental nursing were team-based learning (19.8%) and case-based learning (19.8%), and for practice classes, objective structured clinical examination (29.7%). In the cross analysis, 28.8% of the nursing professor used the constructivist teaching methods in fundamental nursing and in practice classes.
Conclusion: There is a need to continue to improve teaching methods for new nurse-educators and professors and to discuss learning outcomes of fundamental nursing.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
°£È£, ±³À°, ¼º°ú
Nursing, Education, Outcome
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|